SpaceX is reportedly preparing an IPO in 2026 with four major banks. Valuation, cash, defense contracts, and risks: what this really means.
Summary
Press reports indicate that SpaceX is preparing for a possible IPO in 2026, soliciting several major US banks to lead the operation. The appeal is obvious: an IPO would give SpaceX direct access to tens of billions of dollars to finance its priorities, without relying solely on private rounds or secondary sales. The issue is all the more sensitive given that the company combines rapidly growing commercial revenues via Starlink, industrial dominance in reusable launches, and a rise in defense contracts through Starshield. If the operation goes ahead, it could redraw the balance of the space sector by setting a new valuation benchmark. But the IPO would come at a price: financial transparency, quarterly pressure, and increased exposure to controversies surrounding Elon Musk. For competitors, the message would be stark: with virtually unlimited capital, SpaceX could further accelerate its launch pace, industrialize Starship more quickly, and lock down institutional markets for the long term.
IPO rumors already shifting the balance of power
The rumor is circulating insistently: SpaceX is preparing for an IPO in 2026, relying on four Wall Street banks to organize a potentially gigantic operation. In practice, this should not be read as a “finalized” decision. An IPO is always dependent on the market, the level of volatility, and the US political calendar.
But that’s not the important part. When a company like SpaceX starts putting together a top-tier banking syndicate, it means it’s preparing several options at the same time: a full IPO, a partial listing, or a hybrid liquidity mechanism.
In the SpaceX universe, access to capital is not a constraint. The company has already proven that it knows how to attract investors. The constraint is volume. To finance the next industrial leap, it needs to move to amounts that exceed the logic of private rounds.
An IPO then becomes a tactical tool. Not just to raise money, but to impose a new scale on the entire space industry.
The choice of the stock market, a very rational lever for SpaceX
An IPO serves three concrete objectives.
The first is the ability to raise massive amounts of money in a single operation. The figures put forward in discussions refer to raising $25 billion, or even more depending on the market window. At this level, we are no longer financing a “ramp-up.” We are financing a change in industrial scale.
The second is liquidity. SpaceX is a private company, and employees and certain investors regularly want to convert part of their shares. Until now, this has been done through secondary sales, organized at regular intervals. An IPO would remove this barrier, with a permanent market.
The third is the power of attraction. A listed company, especially one with very high capitalization, attracts talent, suppliers, and sometimes institutional clients more easily. It’s paradoxical, but true: listing reassures people about the company’s longevity, even if it imposes constraints.
Valuation, the real issue exciting the markets
A SpaceX IPO would be scrutinized like a referendum on the “New Space” economy. The figures being bandied about are spectacular.
The most recent private reference is a valuation of $800 billion from an internal transaction, with a share price reported in the financial press. This figure is already extraordinary: at this level, SpaceX becomes a financial entity comparable to listed giants, while remaining structurally riskier because it is still highly exposed to industrial execution.
Even more ambitious, some are talking about a $1.5 trillion target for the IPO. This level would not only be a record. It would be a change of category: SpaceX would become a technological and industrial mega-cap, rather than a “space manufacturer.”
To understand what investors are buying, you have to look at the drivers of revenue.
The company is no longer just a launch company. It has become a space telecommunications company thanks to Starlink. And that is precisely what justifies the scale of the valuations.
The business model that makes the IPO credible
SpaceX has achieved a rare transition: building a recurring model around a historically cyclical business.
Orbital launch, a volume and margin machine
The industrial base is based on the reusable Falcon 9, which has made the pace possible. Reusability is not just a marketing argument. It is at the heart of the economy: it reduces marginal costs and allows missions to be multiplied without multiplying factories at the same rate.
The pace has reached record levels. SpaceX carried out 134 Falcon launches in 2024 and has announced that it is aiming for around 170 in 2025. These figures are not just details. They structure everything: reliability, infrastructure amortization, launch pad availability, and the ability to “absorb” institutional customers without blocking the civilian market.
Starlink, the growth engine that is changing the financial picture
Starlink provides recurring revenue that is more transparent and more valuable on the stock market. The logic is simple: a monthly subscription is worth more in terms of valuation than a one-off launch mission.
Public estimates give an order of magnitude: SpaceX is estimated to have generated approximately $11.8 billion in revenue in 2024 and is projected to generate approximately $15.5 billion in 2025. This level changes the nature of the company. It moves from being an engineering champion to a group capable of producing regular cash flows, which the markets love.
The weight of defense, discreet but structuring
Even if the initial article is not focused on “defense,” SpaceX is now a player in the sector, and not just a service provider.
Starshield, the “government” version of Starlink, crystallizes this evolution. The program is often summarized as a militarized Starlink, but the real issue is broader: hardened communications, integration with classified networks, and resilience in degraded environments.
In terms of contracts, several public reports describe a classified $1.8 billion agreement for a constellation of intelligence satellites for a U.S. agency, within the scope of Starshield. It should be added that SpaceX is also indispensable for U.S. military launches, as no competitor currently offers the same combination of frequency, price, and reliability.
For investors, this creates a layer of “institutional revenue” that is less sensitive to economic cycles. For competitors, this means one thing: SpaceX’s lead is no longer just technological, it is contractual.
The operational impact of an IPO on SpaceX
It is often forgotten, but an IPO is not just about paying engineers. It is about buying industrial time.
With a massive fundraising effort, SpaceX can accelerate on three fronts.
The first is Starship, which remains the most expensive and risky project. But it is also the one that, if successful, will profoundly change the space economy. An IPO offers “breathless” investment capacity, meaning that there is no need to renegotiate a private round every six months.
The second is Starlink, which requires constant satellite renewal and improvements in payload, links, and total capacity. Here too, more capital means faster upscaling.
The third is ground infrastructure: stations, terminals, integration with telecom operators, and security. It’s expensive, less spectacular, but crucial to sustaining global growth.
The Elon Musk effect: both fuel and risk
An IPO automatically changes Elon Musk’s position.
Financially, an IPO increases the liquid value of his stake. It also facilitates arbitrage between his various companies and can strengthen his influence.
But it creates an immediate risk: the stock market hates governance uncertainty. Musk is a magnet for controversy, divisive positions, and a form of personal volatility that can be reflected in the share price.
Another point: conflicts of priority. A listed company must explain its strategy, its roadmap, and its risks. In a group where the CEO is steering several projects that are highly exposed to the media, the question of real attention becomes a governance issue.
This is where the IPO can become a constraint: SpaceX will have to reassure investors about the stability of its management, even if the internal culture remains “Muskan.”
Competition, the main victim of a listed SpaceX
If SpaceX raises tens of billions, the competition will come under immediate pressure.
When it comes to launches, rivals must invest in reuse and industrialization, while enduring an implicit price war. ULA, Blue Origin, Arianespace, Rocket Lab, and new European entrants are not all playing the same game, but they all face the same reality: SpaceX sets the pace.
In satellite internet, Amazon Kuiper and other projects must accelerate even as Starlink already has a head start in terms of constellation, customers, and operational experience.
In defense, the stakes are higher: when a company combines industrial dominance with contractual dominance, it becomes a “system.” The exit is complicated, even with a good product. It takes time, institutional trust, and independent launch capability.
Weaknesses that the stock market will not forgive
Being publicly traded exposes SpaceX to questions that a private company can avoid.
The first is transparency on margins. The market will demand to understand actual profitability: Is Starlink profitable by region? Are institutional launches more profitable? How much of the expenditure is “capex” and how much is “opex”?
The second is regulation. Starlink is a global operator, and issues of frequency, sovereignty, and cybersecurity will intensify.
The third is Starship execution. Until Starship is mature, it is a heavy industrial gamble. An acceptable gamble privately, but one that can become a factor of volatility on the stock market.
What this IPO would really say about the future of space
A SpaceX IPO in 2026 would be more than a financial event. It would be a signal: space is becoming a mass industry, not just a project industry.
For SpaceX, the operation would offer a direct advantage: accelerating without brakes, investing faster, and consolidating already dominant positions.
For Elon Musk, it would be a strengthening of power, but with the constraint of public discipline.
For the competition, it would be an even more difficult race: no longer against a “very good” company, but against a company capable of buying industrial time in quantity.
And for governments, including those in Europe, it would be a stark reminder that access to orbit, communications, and data is becoming a matter of sovereignty. If the global leader finances itself like a mega-tech company, then the response must be to think in terms of industrial strategy, not just programs.
Sources
- Reuters — “SpaceX lines up four Wall Street banks for mega 2026 IPO, source says”
- Financial Times — “Elon Musk’s SpaceX lines up four banks for blockbuster IPO”
- Reuters — “SpaceX sets $800 billion valuation amid insider share sale”
- Reuters — “Musk’s SpaceX is building spy satellite network under $1.8 billion NRO contract”
- Reuters — “SpaceX will record revenue about $15.5 billion in 2025, Elon Musk says”
- Novaspace — “Starlink outpaces launches: SpaceX enters new era of profitability”
- Payload Space — “Estimating SpaceX’s 2024 revenue”
- Forbes — “SpaceX recruiting four Wall Street investment banks for IPO, report says”
- The Guardian — “SpaceX lines up Wall Street banks as Musk eyes blockbuster IPO”
War Wings Daily is an independant magazine.