Video in Congress: a Hellfire appears to strike an orb near Yemen. Technical analysis, credible hypotheses, costs and challenges of UAPs, transparency required.
Summary
During a hearing in the US Congress, an elected representative showed a video filmed on October 30, 2024 off the coast of Yemen. It shows an MQ-9 Reaper firing a Hellfire missile at a “luminous orb” with no apparent effect: the projectile continues on its trajectory and the object remains intact. Some researchers see this as non-human technology, while others suggest it was a test firing, an unarmed missile, or simply an optical illusion. Technically, a Hellfire carries about 9 kg of explosives and costs nearly €92,000; its failure to detonate raises questions about the weaponry, the rocket logic, or the geometry of the shot. The episode comes amid an increase in UAP reports and pressure for greater transparency. Above all, it illustrates the gap between public perception and military analysis: without raw data or telemetry, it is impossible to decide between a mundane hypothesis and a truly abnormal phenomenon.
The context and chain of custody of the video
The institutional framework is as important as the pixels. The hearing was held within the Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets attached to the House Oversight Committee, with the participation of witnesses (former military personnel and a journalist, George Knapp). The video, provided by an anonymous source according to the elected official, is said to have been taken by an MQ-9 Reaper sensor and a second MQ-9 shooter. The theater of operations—the Yemeni coast—is consistent with U.S. missions to protect maritime routes against Houthi fire and drones in 2024-2025. These elements frame the event: active war zone, complex rules of engagement, “noisy” electromagnetic space, and regular use of guided weapons. At this stage, the military authorities have neither confirmed nor denied the authenticity of the footage, which requires a rigorous approach: requesting the chain of custody (origin, copies, metadata), telemetry flows (flight profile, kinematics, real-time sensors), and firing parameters (type of AGM-114, guidance mode, armament status, fuse logic). Without this data, any conclusion about the nature of the “luminous orb” is speculative. At the same time, official literature indicates an increase in UAP reports between May 2023 and June 2024, which explains the political interest in these hearings and public pressure for the release of images. Caution is warranted: the context is plausible, but the evidence is still fragmentary.
The missile and the vector: what physics tells us
Understanding what an AGM-114 “should” do helps in interpreting the video. A Hellfire weighs about 47–49 kg, flies at around Mach 1.3 (≈ 1,600 km/h), and carries an explosive charge of around 8–9 kg depending on the variant. Most versions intended for MQ-9s use semi-active laser guidance, with programmable impact or delay fuse logic depending on the model. Except for specific anti-aircraft variants, the Hellfire is not designed to intercept small, maneuverable aerial targets; it remains optimized against surface targets (vehicles, boats, shelters).
Technically, there are four possible explanations for the absence of a visible explosion:
1) “grazing shot” or tangential contact that does not activate the fuse;
2) unarmed missile (minimum arming distance not reached, defect, or training shot);
3) impact in a non-“hard” area of the object and hydrodynamic ricochet if the angle crosses the foam;
4) misleading perception due to IR/EO windowing, parallax, or video compression, giving the illusion of a trajectory coincidence.
The “intrinsic invulnerability” hypothesis is not necessary to explain the observation, even if it remains theoretically possible as long as the raw data is missing. On the platform side, the MQ-9 Reaper can carry up to eight Hellfires and operate for more than 20 hours depending on the load, making it a good “sensor/effects truck” but, by doctrine, not a dedicated air-to-air interceptor. The kinematics, tracking angle, and weapon logic therefore remain the key to analysis, not exoticism.
Plausible scenarios: from military testing to misinterpretation
Let’s put aside posturing: the claim of “non-human technology” must pass Occam’s razor test. Scenario A, test firing or training missile: the existence of inert/captive munitions is documented; an unarmed Hellfire will not detonate and may “pass” close to the target. Scenario B, unfavorable geometry: if the laser pointer is lost briefly or if the line of sight fluctuates, a SAL-Hellfire may “aim” at the wrong point and miss by a meter; at the video’s frame rate, a near miss may appear to be a collision. Scenario C, misinterpreted “trivial” target: recent history has shown cases of balloons, birds, or light drones whose IR/EO signature, at certain angles, appears “extraordinary.” Scenario D, anti-UAS experimentation: there are proximity fuse variants/settings on certain families, but this is neither the core mission of the Hellfire nor a panacea against very small objects. Scenario E, deception/adversary: a reflective decoy, a metal balloon, or a local plasma effect around an object can confuse the impact assessment. Finally, Scenario F, truly abnormal object: persistent trajectory, absence of visible debris, and “clean” kinematics call for further documentation. The correct method is simple and unglamorous: obtain telemetry from both MQ-9s (sensor platform and shooter), the designator logs, the fuse parameters, and the mission report; then compare this data with the timestamp, wind, sea, and other sensors (onboard radar, ISR links). As long as these pieces are missing, talking about “invulnerability” is more of a media reflex than an analysis.
Operational and economic implications: cost/effectiveness and anti-drones
From a military standpoint, the “cost versus cost” angle is central. A Hellfire historically costs around $100,000 per unit (≈ €92,000 in 2015), sometimes more depending on the variant and year. Using ammunition of this class against an uncertain target off the coast of Yemen raises the question of more economical alternatives: dedicated anti-UAS proximity fuse missiles, small guided rockets, remote-controlled cannons with programmable ammunition, or even jamming/hard-kill for naval self-defense. In the Red Sea, the United States has carried out numerous actions against Houthi drones and missiles; the MQ-9 has sometimes been targeted or lost itself, which has stimulated the use of the platform as a long-endurance “armed sensor.” From a tactical point of view, firing an MQ-9 at an aerial target is not absurd if the window is short and no other layer is available; however, it is only a stopgap solution. For the anti-drone sector, the video highlights the urgent need for an appropriate portfolio: close-range SHADE/SHORAD, cost-effective munitions, and networked sensor-effect integration. It also reminds us of one fact: without positive identification and a reliable assessment of the danger, “demonstration” by video is not enough to establish doctrine. In short, lethality must be aligned with the right price per effect and per context, not by reflex.
Transparency, witnesses, and figures: what we really know
Beyond a viral sequence, the figures provide the measure. The AARO office recorded 757 new reports between May 2023 and June 2024; the majority have a prosaic explanation, a fraction remain “insufficiently characterized,” and a minority remain open due to a lack of adequate data. Recent hearings have highlighted testimonies (Vandenberg, “rectangles” or “Tic-Tacs”) and grievances about hindered careers. These accounts deserve to be heard but must be corroborated by usable data. Frank stance: the institution has an obligation of transparency, but the extraordinary requires extraordinary evidence. To move forward, three concrete steps are needed: publication of raw metadata (STANAG formats if possible), supervised release of full-resolution videos (no recompressed copies), and cross-checking by mixed teams (government/industry/researchers). In this context, the Hellfire episode becomes a useful “test case” for improving methods and sensors. Otherwise, everyone will project their own beliefs. Science and engineering demand numbers, not slogans.
War Wings Daily is an independant magazine.