Lockheed Martin plans to test a space interceptor in orbit by 2028 as part of the Golden Dome program, the cornerstone of the future US missile defense shield.
Summary
US giant Lockheed Martin is preparing an in-orbit demonstration of a space interceptor before 2028, the first since the end of the Cold War. This test is part of the Golden Dome program, a strategic initiative to build a global missile defense shield capable of intercepting ballistic threats before they re-enter the atmosphere. This concept, conceived during the Trump administration, revives the logic of “Star Wars”: neutralizing a missile in space rather than as it approaches the ground. But the technological challenge is immense: hypervelocity trajectories, real-time communications, kinetic precision at several kilometers per second, and astronomical costs. Politically, this ambition spatializes deterrence and opens a new era of militarization of orbit, in a context of increased competition between the United States, China, and Russia for control of exoatmospheric space.
The Golden Dome concept: a multi-layered planetary shield
The Golden Dome project is inspired by the historical concept of defense in depth. The idea is not to have a single interception system, but several complementary layers—terrestrial, aerial, and now orbital. The United States already has a composite anti-missile arsenal: Ground-Based Interceptors (GBI) in Alaska, THAAD, Aegis BMD, and Patriot PAC-3 for the terminal layer.
The Golden Dome adds a space layer that would target the exo-atmospheric or ascending phase of a ballistic missile’s flight. Intercepting before the separation of warheads or decoys dramatically increases the chances of success, as the target is still a single body.
This architecture must be integrated into the Space Force and piloted by the Missile Defense Agency (MDA). It is based on a constellation of small satellites armed with high-speed kinetic interceptors that can be commanded on demand. The goal is to create a permanent orbital net covering sensitive regions of the globe.
The logic of space “hit-to-kill”: extreme precision
Exo-atmospheric interception is based on the principle of hit-to-kill, a direct strike by kinetic impact, without explosives. At 7 to 9 km/s, the energy released by the collision is enough to vaporize the target. This technology already exists on the ground (as on the SM-3 Block IIA), but its application in orbit requires a much higher level of trajectory control.
The interceptor developed by Lockheed Martin Space would use a compact platform, powered by variable-thrust micro-engines, and equipped with a high-resolution infrared sensor coupled with autonomous AI navigation. These interceptors will have to detect, discriminate and correct their trajectory from several thousand kilometers away, with a reaction time of less than 5 seconds after the firing order.
The real challenge is not just speed or accuracy, but synchronization: coordinating an orbital launch, target identification, and interception at Mach 20 in a space where trajectories change in milliseconds.
The 2028 test: a crucial demonstration for Lockheed Martin
The first in-orbit test is scheduled before 2028, according to Lockheed Martin. The objective will be to demonstrate the kinematic feasibility of firing from an orbital platform at a simulated target. This demonstration will not target a real warhead but an instrumented ballistic target, likely launched from a Pacific test range.
The scenario envisaged would involve an experimental interceptor satellite positioned in low orbit (approximately 500 km), capable of identifying and striking a target in its ascent phase.
Ground tests have already validated several subsystems:
- the broadband IR sensor, derived from the Next Generation Interceptor (NGI) missile;
- the micropropulsion inertial guidance system developed by Lockheed Missiles & Fire Control;
- the orbital data link in a mesh architecture to coordinate multiple interceptors.
If the demonstration is successful, the MDA could launch a pre-production program around 2030, as part of the future Layered Homeland Defense system incorporating the Golden Dome.
Technological challenges: real-time space mechanics
Interception in space involves complex geometry. Interceptors must maneuver at high speed while maintaining stable attitude control. The slightest angular deviation—a few thousandths of a degree—represents kilometers of drift.
Communication with the ground cannot be constant, hence the use of laser inter-satellite links and autonomous navigation based on on-board intelligence. These devices will also have to withstand extreme thermal shocks (from -120°C to +200°C) and cosmic radiation, and maintain continuous electrical power via miniaturized solar panels.
The issue of reusability is also being studied. Lockheed is exploring a model in which the platforms would remain in orbit for several years, with refueling or modular recharging capabilities via space cargo ships, similar to the future logistics satellites envisaged by the Space Force.
The strategic and political risks of an orbital interceptor
Strategically, the installation of kinetic weapons in orbit reactivates the mechanisms of mistrust inherited from the Cold War.
The 1967 Outer Space Treaty prohibits the placement of nuclear weapons in orbit, but does not explicitly ban kinetic or directed energy interceptors. Washington is relying on this legal ambiguity to legitimize the development of the Golden Dome.
Russia and China, for their part, denounce a violation of the strategic balance and are working on their own countermeasures:
- In 2021, China tested a hypersonic glide vehicle (HGV) capable of maneuvering outside detection zones.
- Russia is banking on the Avangard and Sarmat systems, designed to saturate or bypass any orbital defense.
The entry into service of American space interceptors would reignite a defensive orbit race, in which each power would seek to place interception or blinding capabilities in low orbit.
The militarization of space is now accepted
The US Space Force, created in 2019, is no longer a simple support corps: it is becoming an active deterrent. The Golden Dome embodies this change in doctrine: moving from reactive defense to permanent defensive projection.
Space is no longer just a medium for observation, but an operational dimension where the first minutes of a potential war are played out.
The Pentagon embraces this stance: it is better to have orbital capabilities capable of intercepting before re-entry than to wait for salvos of hypersonic weapons approaching the American continent.
The United States also wants to preempt the industrial field. Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and Raytheon are positioning themselves on this future budget line, estimated at more than $5 billion by 2030 for orbital R&D.
Alternatives and current limitations of the concept
While the technological promise is appealing, critics point to several weaknesses.
The unit cost of a space interceptor would far exceed that of an SM-3, with no guarantee of reuse.
Exposure to orbital debris could render certain areas inoperable.
Finally, the risk of saturation by swarms of missiles or decoys remains high: no defense, even orbital, can guarantee 100% interception.
Alternative projects are emerging in parallel, relying on directed energy weapons (lasers or microwaves) to neutralize a missile in its ascent phase, but their technological maturity remains low on an operational scale.
A decisive step towards next-generation orbital defense
The test planned by Lockheed Martin before 2028 symbolizes a breakthrough: the United States wants to test, under real conditions, the ability of an interceptor to operate from space. This is the missing link between orbital detection (SBIRS/Next-Gen OPIR constellation) and kinetic strike.
If successful, the Golden Dome will become the first orbital anti-missile bubble in development, marking a new phase in the militarization of space.
The demonstration will not only validate a technology: it will formalize a doctrine—that of proactive exo-atmospheric defense. And in the growing rivalry between major powers, this doctrine could well redefine the relationship between civil space, planetary defense, and strategic deterrence.
Sources
– The War Zone / The Drive: “Lockheed To Test Golden Dome Space-Based Interceptor In Orbit By 2028.”
– Lockheed Martin Space: official press releases on the orbital interceptor program.
– Missile Defense Agency: “Layered Homeland Defense Concept and Space Layer Studies,” 2024.
– Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS): “Space-Based Interceptors and U.S. Strategic Posture,” 2023.
– U.S. Space Force: 2024 guidelines on orbital militarization and cooperation with the MDA.
– Federation of American Scientists: legal analyses of the 1967 Treaty and status of space-based kinetic weapons.
War Wings Daily is an independant magazine.